Planning better journeys for buy-ins and buy-outs
Drawing on practical experience from real transactions, let’s take a look at the common pitfalls and key success factors that schemes must consider to deliver smooth, timely, and member-focused insurance transactions in the current market.
Ready, set, go!
At Vidett’s recent Endgame Solutions Conference at Silverstone, our third session, ‘Beyond Blame – Building Better Outcomes’, focused on the practical realities of delivering successful buy-ins and buy-outs. I chaired the discussion with an expert panel made up of:
- Steve Southern (Vidett)
- Claire Southern (Hogan Lovells)
- Maurice Speer (Mercer)
- Leah Evans (Aon)
- Simon Bramwell (Rothesay), and
- Gavin Giles (Broadstone).
As the market becomes busier and more complex, achieving a smooth insurance transaction in the current market requires far more than just technical expertise, it demands preparation, collaboration, and robust governance from the outset. Together, we shared lessons from real transactions, highlighting how to avoid common pitfalls and build better outcomes for members.
Funding level improvements over recent years, together with a healthy annuity market boosted by new entries, results in transactions taking place in a competitive yet capacity-constrained environment. We agreed that early planning and realistic timelines are now essential. While delays, administrator capacity restraints and data issues are common; they’re largely manageable with the right approach.
One of the key themes we uncovered was the importance of engaging advisers, particularly investment consultants, administrators, and legal teams from the outset. The late involvement of any core stakeholder can derail a transaction, create costly delays, or damage sponsor-trustee relations. Early engagement also allows for appropriate budgeting and better alignment of objectives across the project. Examples were given of cases where assumptions were made about the liquidity of scheme assets, resulting in material issues in the run-up to the desired transaction date because assets took longer to disinvest than the (non-investment) advisers) had allowed for. Likewise, assumptions about data quality or administrator response times can cause issues down the line if the administration team is not consulted in early stages of project planning.
With all that said, here are my top four areas to keep in mind:
Governance and collaboration are critical
Learn more
Well-structured governance and joint working groups between trustees and sponsors can help build consensus, reduce friction, and ensure progress is not lost after the initial buy-in. Appropriate governance arrangements, with well managed programme coordination, should span the full end-to-end journey, from preparation through buy-in, all the way to buy-out and wind-up. The position immediately post-buy-in was identified as a time it is really important to keep the “foot on the gas” and not drop the governance baton (if mixed metaphors get past the editor of this blog!)
Data matters - and needs time
Learn more
Data quality continues to be a key barrier to smooth transactions. Years of under-investment in administration and data, particularly if combined with administration practices inconsistent with the scheme rules, can create major hurdles during the approach to buy-out. The time required to undertake this work, and the impact of potential issues that might arise, should not be underestimated. Data cleansing, documentation, and testing should always start early and be properly resourced.
Managing expectations through communication
Learn more
Clear communication and reporting across all parties from trustees, sponsors, advisers to members is also vital. Setting and maintaining realistic timelines helps reduce uncertainty, avoids reputational risk and keeps everyone aligned. Transparent, timely updates are essential for building trust and avoiding unnecessary stress.
Legal risks need prompt attention
Learn more
Schemes often underestimate the time required to resolve legal issues — particularly where older rules, unclear surplus provisions, or out-of-date partial buy-in contracts are involved. Bringing in legal advisers early, establishing clear benefit specifications and agreeing the approach to comfort letters where needed can all help prevent delays at the final hurdle.
Recommendations
•
Ensure Early, holistic planning to involve investment consultants, administrators, and legal advisers from the start — not after project plans have been drafted.
•
Develop robust governance with trustees playing a vital role in leading the process. A clear framework, good decision-making and strong programme coordination are key.
•
Create joint working groups to help collaborate with sponsors and stakeholders to align objectives and manage risks throughout the full project lifecycle.
•
Good data is essential, so budget properly for data work and begin cleansing early. Poor data cannot be fixed at the last minute. This will help you…
•
Setting realistic timelines as you factor in data cleansing, governance, legal review, and capacity constraints will be beneficial.
•
Establish strong governance for every stage – including buy-in to buy-out.
•
Create clear member communications, to keep members informed with straightforward updates to manage expectations – what is happening, when and why.
•
Finally, please encourage a ‘no-blame’ culture, focused on building collaboration and problem-solving.
Next steps
With the buy-out market busier than ever, its success depends on doing the basics well. With early planning, strong governance, and collaboration with all stakeholders, together we can all help our schemes deliver the outcomes members should expect and more importantly, deserve.
Our latest insights
Related insights from our team at Vidett.
